<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>ISCSI on This Is My Demo</title><link>https://thisismydemo.cloud/tags/iscsi/</link><description>Recent content in ISCSI on This Is My Demo</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2026 02:14:44 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://thisismydemo.cloud/tags/iscsi/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Three-Tier Storage Integration</title><link>https://thisismydemo.cloud/post/three-tier-storage-integration/</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://thisismydemo.cloud/post/three-tier-storage-integration/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Not everything needs to be hyper-converged.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There&amp;rsquo;s a strong narrative in the infrastructure world that three-tier architecture—separate compute, network, and storage tiers—is outdated. That hyper-converged infrastructure (HCI) is the only path forward. That separating your storage from your compute is a legacy pattern.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That narrative is incomplete.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Three-tier architecture remains the right answer for many workloads and many organizations. If you have an existing SAN investment, if your workloads require deterministic storage performance, if you need storage-level replication for disaster recovery, or if your team has deep storage operations expertise—three-tier isn&amp;rsquo;t just viable, it&amp;rsquo;s often superior.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>